MAAP
| Category | Score | % | Callout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon & Emissions | 0 / 20 | 0% | ⚠ Gap |
| Nature, Biodiversity & Materials | 8 / 20 | 40% | — |
| People & Supply Chain | 5 / 20 | 25% | ⚠ Gap |
| Business Ethos & Governance | 2 / 15 | 13% | ⚠ Gap |
| Transparency & Accountability | 2 / 10 | 20% | ⚠ Gap |
| Clothing Category | 4 / 15 | 27% | ⚠ Gap |
What MAAP does well
MAAP was the first cycling apparel brand to join the Bluesign System — a rigorous, independently verified standard that covers chemical safety and environmental management across the full production chain, not just at the finished product level. The brand's OffCuts programme, which produces jerseys from excess production fabric that would otherwise go to waste, is a practical circularity initiative developed in partnership with its manufacturing partner.
Where the gaps are
The rest of the scorecard is largely absent. MAAP confirmed in press coverage as recently as January 2026 that it is not yet tracking its carbon emissions. The brand's sustainability webpage returned only a header and footer when accessed for this assessment. No substantive response was received to our brand survey. Manufacturing takes place across factories in Lithuania, Romania, Vietnam, Ukraine, and Belarus, with no published supply chain policies or factory names provided by the brand directly.
Verdict: MAAP is rated Listed under the Ethical Endurance Framework. The Bluesign partnership is a genuine chemical safety credential, but published evidence on carbon, supply chain, and governance is almost entirely absent.
See how MAAP compares. This profile is one of several assessments in our Sustainable Cycling Clothing Buying Guide, or browse the full Brand Directory to search and filter across every brand we've assessed.